

- APOLLO RW 2009 STEROWNIKI BLUETOOTH DRIVERS
- APOLLO RW 2009 STEROWNIKI BLUETOOTH DRIVER
- APOLLO RW 2009 STEROWNIKI BLUETOOTH PATCH
- APOLLO RW 2009 STEROWNIKI BLUETOOTH FULL
- APOLLO RW 2009 STEROWNIKI BLUETOOTH CODE
However, if they added a new argument to a "public" function (function used outside of the mpt3sas driver) or a new field to a struct used externally from the mpt3sas driver things may APPEAR to work. This means if syno decided to add a field to a struct in mpt3sas driver and that field was added to a struct used ONLY in mpt3sas driver you can probably load the old driver and be fine.

Everything is based on static assignment (ok, not everything, but lets make a simplification here). Languages like C or ASM (or hardware in general) doesn't have magical way of discovering sizes of things. If you don't have the sources for the new kernel (since if you did you wouldn't bother lifting the driver from an older version) you cannot know if the data structures changed. Depending on WHAT was changed in the driver sometimes you can use kernel from a different kernel version. that's a different story and it's not as easy as it seems.

To be honest they have no way around it as they apply vendor-specific hacks for e.g. driver from kernel from 3.10.105 and fake the version compiling for 3.10.108 hoping not much changed.

In case of small-ish bumps in kernel it's usually safe to get e.g. Sure, there are ways to figure this out, but the only sane approach is to use the source provided by syno.
APOLLO RW 2009 STEROWNIKI BLUETOOTH CODE
Good luck loading such driver and using it.įor that reason alone you CANNOT use vanilla kernel code as you don't know which version of the code has to be used. as in fact they previously lifted a newer one from 3.20 and stuffed it in 3.10. Often times if you take a driver from vanilla 3.10 you will realize that suddenly doesn't work at all.
APOLLO RW 2009 STEROWNIKI BLUETOOTH DRIVERS
In case you don't see it: this poses a HUGE problem for using drivers from the vanilla kernel. They get that commit and apply to their 3.10.108 making it 3.10.109. 3.19.0 and check commits which add features they want. 3.10.108 which was modified to oblivion, then download the e.g. However, after some time these companies realize they want new features from new kernel but cannot get them as their modifications no longer apply to a new version. This is something which kernel devs don't really like but since it's an open-source project everyone can. Syno, like many other companies, take the kernel and modify it in house.
APOLLO RW 2009 STEROWNIKI BLUETOOTH PATCH
"upstream it" = make your custom patch for the kernel and get it accepted into the normal kernel sources
APOLLO RW 2009 STEROWNIKI BLUETOOTH FULL
mpt3sas driver wants something from mpt2sas you cannot use toolchain to compile mpt3sas and you NEED full sources. What's important they DO NOT contain private interaction between modules. You will find these under "include" or in the syno toolchain. h files but only a subset of public API kernel provides. "vanilla kernel" = source of the kernel which is the official version from "in-tree" = code which exists within the source of the kernel in terms of drivers it means you will find it under "drivers/" (e.g. First lets address few terms which are used in kernel development: Now let us explain each one of them separately and why this is an issue. The three major ones are:ġ) Versioning of syno kernel's is broken due to backportingĤ) Data structures missing in toolchains for in-tree drivers There are few major issue with compiling drivers against a different sources. Let us explain where's the problem, this applies to many questions really. This is going to be a separate post addressing "why you cannot randomly grab drivers and compile them" so we can link to it. Why there's a problem with compiling drivers when syno didn't publish kernel sources? We will try to respond to as many as possible so stay tight Start, and jumkey uses the mpt3sas source code of 4.4.180 released by the Linux open source community to compile the mpt3sas driver, which can be loaded correctly and recognize the hard disk, so if for data security considerations, should we wait until Qunhui releases the 41890 kernel source code?įinally we've got some time to respond to the questions. Unfortunately, for LSI drivers, such as mptsas3, I have tried many times to use the 25426branch kernel code of 918 to compile, and errors will be reported when the driver is loaded (the specific error content I mentioned in the above post) and the system cannot be correct.
